Protests etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Protests etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

6 Aralık 2013 Cuma

University of strife: the latest wave of student protests

It is a cold and impossibly moist Thursday afternoon in Bloomsbury, central London, and not for the first time, it is all kicking off. A pack of police minibuses has just sped into Russell Square, and scores of Met personnel are now spilling on to the streets. Behind the gates of the University of London’s administrative offices, other officers wield metal batons, sporadically lashing out at a crowd of student protesters who have marched right here from close by Malet Street. Inside of minutes, the line along which the college students and police face off has been established, and a succession of chants fills the air: “Cops out! College students in! … Whose streets? Our streets! … You killed Mark Duggan!”


This kind of is the spectacle that has erupted close to a Cops Off Campus demonstration, organised anonymously by means of tumblr. Right after a torrential downpour and an ad hoc occupation of the westbound side of Marylebone Street at the peak of rush hour, the centre of events quickly shifts to Gower Street, and the entrance to Euston Square tube station. Shut by, twenty or so protesters have apparently been kettled. A police helicopter thrums overhead. Every single few minutes, there is a flash of renewed confrontation. “We just want to say we will not want cops on our campus,” 1 pupil tells me. “But the police want a battle.”


Thanks to the upsurge of anger about tuition costs, 2010 marked a highpoint of student protest, noticed most substantially when protesters attacked the Westminster HQ of the Conservative get together. Because then, an apparent quietening of student dissent and the arrival of a supposed economic recovery may possibly have given the impression that the bitter mood of three many years ago would not return.


But as events this week have proved, some youthful folks continue to be incensed – and not just about costs, but a tangle of concerns that runs from the privatisation of university jobs and services, by means of the lower-finish spend and conditions of staff on campus, to what several students see as the toxic effects of larger education being pushed towards the logic of the totally free industry. Especially in London, there is also growing anger about the recurrent presence of police on campus.


In excess of the last week or so, there have also been occupations and protests at universities in Birmingham, Brighton, Exeter, Warwick, Derry, and Liverpool – barely reported in the mainstream press, but chronicled and sustained by way of social media. Outwardly, their major trigger was Tuesday’s strike by academics and other university workers more than genuine-terms pay out cuts and the “miserly” offer you of a 1% rise. But the men and women concerned say the pupil protests have now acquired a momentum of their very own.


On Thursday, my day begins at the back of Holborn police station, in the company of all around twenty student activists. Most are from London University’s College of Oriental and African Research, here due to the fact they know two Soas students are being held within – and due to the fact of their personal position in this week’s convulsive occasions on campus.


The earlier day, at all around two.30pm, close to 60 students occupied the very first floor of Senate Property, the art deco leviathan that consists of the administrative base of the University of London and the offices of its senior management. Their action was based mostly on a ten-level agenda, covering almost everything from the spend and problems of outsourced cleaners, by way of the structures of the University of London Union, to a demand that “the pay out ratio among the lowest paid and the highest paid employees in the university need to be decreased to a highest of ten:1″.


Police and protesters face off outside the University of London on Thursday Police and protesters face off outdoors the University of London on Thursday. Photograph: Graeme Robertson for the Guardian


The occupation lasted until finally about 7.20pm, when protesters began to be forcibly eliminated by security employees employed by Balfour Beatty, who handed them above to the police. But outdoors Senate Property, there had been then clashes between police and students, a amount of arrests, and incidents of police violence, as evidenced by a video of one officer punching a protester. Five college students had been arrested 4, the activists tell me, have been brought to Holborn, which then entailed a “rescue assistance” delegation maintaining a vigil overnight.


So, here they are, fending off the cold, passing round roll-ups and bags of chips, and recounting what happened 16 or so hours ago. Maham Hashmi, a 30-year-previous South Asian scientific studies undergraduate, and the University of London Union’s black pupil officer, tells me that Balfour Beatty employees had been “grabbing men and women in acceptable spots”, and that a single of them manhandled her breast (the firm does not respond immediately to this allegation, but claims that “no unnecessary force was used” and “at all times the priority was the security of employees, students and guests”). Adam Barr, a 21-year-previous student of Chinese and Historical past, says he noticed clear proof of police violence: “One particular of the guys who got arrested was struggling from really undesirable concussion. He received hit by a policeman on the back of his head. He could barely target.”


Every single now and once more, someone shouts “Let them go!” in the path of the police station’s outer wall. Right after an hour, a single of the arrested college students emerges from a nearby door – dazed, naturally a little shaken, and reluctant to even give me his name, or inform me no matter whether he has been charged with something.


Instead, I request his pals and supporters an clear query: in terms of basic issues, why are they here? “This is all about the privatisation of training,” says Hashmi. “They’re trying to flip college students into customers.”


The University of London Union, she reminds me, is to be abolished. It will be replaced with a “management-run pupil services centre”, exactly where men and women will be dealt with as individuals rather than a collective, and “the concept of students running things for college students will be pushed away. So it really is generally Thatcherism utilized to students. We won’t have a collective room to organise any much more.”


The activists spend 5 minutes speaking about spot-checks on students carried out by police officers and officials of the United kingdom Border Agency, and the disproportionate cease-and-seeking of black college students. There is mention of the more and more iniquitous fees technique, and the imminent privatisation of the government’s pupil loan guide, which they feel will sooner or later on hike up curiosity rates. College students tied to the new £9,000-a-yr costs regime, they also say, have now reached their 2nd yr of research and, conscious of their mounting debts, have a tendency to be reluctant to get concerned in protest.


They also talk about orthodox politics, and their lack of curiosity in it. None are concerned with any typical parties: from the Lib Dems to the Socialist Workers celebration, mention of them all is met with derisive guffaws. So, as well, is the National Union of Students: “Worse than useless,” says Barr.


The day we meet, George Osborne has compounded the sense that the protesters and occupiers are element of a distinctly place-upon generation with the information they will have to function until they are 70. “And by the time we in fact retire, it’ll be, ‘Oh, you can not even retire any more,’” says twenty-yr-old Tom King, who’s studying politics. “That is what it’ll be like except if we get people carrying out the variety of things we did yesterday.


“What we have to remind people of is that we’re going to be the generation who are going to get fucked over: totally and utterly, in a way no generation has in the previous,” says Hashmi. “Until finally we realise that we truly have practically nothing to lose, we’re not going to put adequate power into this. But that’s what folks here have completed. Due to the fact we virtually have nothing to lose.”


students protest at sussex university College students at Sussex University protest against programs to privatise components of the campus. Photograph: Martin Godwin for the Guardian


At Sussex University, an occupation of the campus conference centre started on 26 November. 7 days later, college students announced an end to their protest, and joined striking academics and other university personnel. Quickly following that, a handful of the protesters have been told by way of e mail that they had been suspended from the university: they are now collectively acknowledged as the Sussex 5, and baffled by what has took place to them.


Amongst them is 23-year-outdated Adriano Merola Marotta, who was till just lately studying for an MA in global politlical economic climate, obtaining been at Sussex given that 2009. He says he has no idea of how extended his suspension will last, or his signifies of redress. “It feels quite personalized,” he says. Obviously, it also puts the kibosh on his scientific studies: amid other issues, there are imminent exams he will not be able to sit.


The Sussex protests, he says, are partly centered on two situations of privatisation: the handing-more than of “facilities management” to the outsourcing firm Interserve, due to happen in January and the contracting-out of “conference and catering” function to Chartwells, a subsidiary of the giant Compass group, which has meant modified terms and problems, including zero-hrs contracts. But there are plainly even greater troubles at stake. “Privatisation is the catalyst,” Marotta says. “But now we’re seeing a national motion, demanding more democracy for young people in universities.


“We truly feel there’s a race to the bottom by all three key events, about which celebration can be most hostile to younger individuals. In all the debates close to benefits and tuition fees and the cuts, we truly feel we have been left aside by politicians. And the managers in our universities who look to be operating in much the identical way.”


Back in London, I meet Michael Chessum, the University of London Union’s president. On 14 November, the day soon after an on-campus demonstration about ULU’s abolition, he was arrested under the Public Purchase Act, as he understands it, on the grounds he had failed to serve observe that the protest would take area (campus demos, he tells me, are typical events, and arrests like his have not took place ahead of). Regardless of whether he’ll be charged is unclear, but he sees what happened to him as part of a basic ample story: the deliberate focusing on of student activists by university authorities and the police.


On campus, the atmosphere is uneasy. “A person was arrested for chalking anything on a wall during a cleaners’ demonstration,” he says. “I got arrested. Last evening, I noticed amounts of police violence I have not witnessed on a pupil demonstration considering that Parliament square [in December 2010]. They did not pull out truncheons they were just hitting and kicking people. I have received bruises. It truly is nearly unprecedented for the police to evict an occupation by force on the 1st night. And these guys have been riot cops. We know that simply because of the vans they have been driving, and the way they behaved.”


Hyperlink to video: Police officer ‘punches’ pupil at University of London protest


As he sees it, the technique taken by the university authorities (who have now been granted a Substantial Court injunction against “protest by occupation” in campus buildings) and police will inevitably backfire. “The image that’s being painted here is of an unaccountable university management shutting down its student union, screwing more than its workers, and shutting down protest.”


The police, he reckons, are implementing lessons discovered above the final number of years: “They saw what took place in 2010 and they did not know what the hell was going on. But what they did in 2011 – huge kettling, mass arrests – place a whole lot of men and women off. They want to fundamentally bludgeon student activism on campus. That’s what we’re seeing, surely from the Met.” (I send a checklist of allegations about this week’s incidents to the force’s press workplace. Their reply says that ”as with all large public purchase incidents, a assortment of materials will now be topic to assessment in purchase to establish the total details”).


A single floor beneath us, the initial shouts are going up from the men and women gathered for the Cops Off Campus demo. Chessum joins the throng and disappears, but I meet him once again outdoors Euston Square tube, anxiously surveying the chaos, and attempting to keep up with the amount of arrests (39, as it turns out).


Employing the exact identical words as Balfour Beatty, the university will subsequently declare that “No needless force was employed” and that “at all times the priority was the safety of employees, students and guests”. Chessum, by contrast, talks about “disproportionate force”, and marvels at the numbers of police. “There is no allow-up,” he says. “It truly is like they’re going for the jugular.”


What are his ideas for the rest of the evening?


“Oh, I’m going to be at Holborn police station for most of the night,” he says. “We’ll all be standing outdoors. For a very long time.”



University of strife: the latest wave of student protests

Student protests are changing tack – and facing heavy police repression | Aaron Bastani

“They aren’t even pulling batons, they are just chasing and punching men and women … it really is weird.”


My colleague is breathless and his tone unusual for an individual so acquainted with the worst excesses of public purchase policing. It displays the speed with which occasions have unfolded because Wednesday afternoon, when about 70 college students occupied the management workplace of Senate Property at the University of London. The demands of the occupiers, reflective of shifts in pupil activism above the final 18 months, had been not only couched in opposition to tuition charges, but also to redundancies and outsourcing during higher schooling as effectively as to the closure of University of London Union. By 8.30pm final night, nine police vans had been existing, five from the territorial help group, and occupiers were being violently evicted. The TSG is especially deployed to deal with public purchase conditions – a lot of would claim, nonetheless, that it is far more very likely to provoke them.


This kind of events ought to be understood within a wider context. In the past two months, both the president and vice-president of ULU have been arrested: the latter, Daniel Cooper, for questioning police officers as to whether they had been cease-and-looking a fellow student simply because he was black the former, Michael Chessum, since he was seen to be foremost a protest on campus in opposition to a university management that is in search of to abolish ULU and with it his office. University of London management say this is to steer clear of duplication of solutions, while ULU activists insist the move represents political opportunism. “The federal university is dying and university management are taking their possibility to get rid of an activist base,” Chessum told me.


Other police-related incidents in Bloomsbury recently consist of the arrest by 16 officers and subsequent strip-search of an activist in response to her creating the demands of the 3Cosas campaign in chalk on a University of London building.


The campaign 3Cosas, which means “3 factors” in Spanish, is fighting to obtain the exact same sick pay, holiday spend and pensions for outsourced staff at the University of London as is at the moment reserved for these in-home. It is emblematic of a type of pupil activism that sees increasingly little variation among students and extremely precarious employees. Undergraduates understand they will encounter an unfavourable labour market place, although graduate students working as teaching assistants frequently acquire the same varieties of spend and functioning conditions that those within the 3Cosas campaign are organising towards. Last week, the campaign won major concessions right after a two-day strike organised by the Independent Workers Union of Wonderful Britain, the union inside which some 120 assistance workers at the University of London are now organised.


This kind of campus activism has endured surveillance by the University of London, such as the filming of protests. Dozens of police have turned up for lunchtime protests, some outfitted with stun guns. In excess of the previous 12 months, independent trade unions, cost-free association and totally free assembly have felt increasingly at odds with the concepts seeming to manual the governance of the University of London.


Elsewhere, five students had been suspended from Sussex University for their involvement in a related occupation that was carried out in solidarity with Tuesday’s strike by unions across greater training. Sussex, like London, is seeing an increasing set of networks amongst not just students and educating workers, but also assistance employees, activists and latest graduates. Efforts to create a “pop-up” union there last year, in opposition to the outsourcing of 235 jobs, ought to be understood inside the exact same context as 3Cosas. Just as varieties of organising are being replicated across campuses, so, also, the message from university managements is the very same: protest, when it is fundamentally at odds with their aims, is not permissible.


Students and graduates, whose genuine pay out has declined by twelve% given that 2008, increasingly have no institutions by means of which to voice genuine grievances on not just costs and the privatisation of student debt, but also problems of increasing charges, lease and working problems. For democracies to work men and women require to really feel that institutions are in their interests, not against them.


As effectively as getting a day of repression of a newer kind of campus activism, far more specifics emerged this week from the inquest into Mark Duggan, whose fatal shooting by police in August 2011 triggered riots across England. One particular of the chants that emerged as police became increasingly violent last night was, “Who killed Mark Duggan, you killed Mark Duggan”. My suspicion is that some of those chanting, a lot of of whom could be regarded historically privileged college students and graduates, more and more come to feel they share a lot more with those rioters in August than the institutions to which they have historically offered their tacit consent. A generation, across financial divides, is swiftly studying a basic reality: that debt, austerity and wage repression necessitates police repression.




Student protests are changing tack – and facing heavy police repression | Aaron Bastani

5 Aralık 2013 Perşembe

Police accused of using excessive force at student protests

Website link to video: Police ‘try to hit students with batons’ at protest


Students were involved in a series of angry confrontations with the police in central London on Thursday as allegations circulated that officers had used unacceptable levels of force to break up campus protests more than the previous few weeks.


Video footage obtained by the Guardian appeared to present one officer striking a hooded protester in the encounter right after college students occupied portion of the University of London Senate Home headquarters on Wednesday.


On Thursday about 200 college students held a “Cops off campus” rally outdoors the University of London Union creating, which led to more violent confrontations with scores of officers that spread to surrounding streets. A Metropolitan police spokesman mentioned there had been 36 arrests.


Michael Chessum, president of the University of London Union, explained: “The level of police force that we have noticed in the final couple of days is absolutely unprecedented on university campuses. It seems pre-planned. It is as if they are reacting to a riot situation – taking the degree of force – and utilizing it towards college students protesting on a university campus.”


On Wednesday, demonstrators had occupied element of the University of London Senate House headquarters. Police and the university’s private security staff broke up the demonstration and five protesters had been arrested, with one particular held on suspicion of assaulting an officer.


College students claimed the police and personal safety staff had been unnecessarily violent and accused officers of assaulting them. Video footage seen by the Guardian appeared to show one particular officer striking a hooded protester in the encounter. In the footage, the demonstrator – who gave his identify as Tee Jay – fell to the ground and the crowd was pushed back.


Jay, 24, from Hackney, north-east London, explained: “Nothing was mentioned. The police have been attempting to clear the crowd of individuals. I turned my back to [the police officer] to variety of walk away, he pushed, I kind of turned round to see who it was – ‘Why are you pushing me?’


“The punch came and I went straight to the floor, then I acquired up and left.” The University of West London media production student said he was component of the group that occupied an region of Senate Home.


Another protester, Helen Singh, a philosophy pupil, claimed she was pushed over by officers, who were “punching men and women indiscriminately”. “We had been walking away from the protest. I was pushed to the ground and my glasses smashed into three pieces,” she stated.


A police spokesman mentioned: “We have acquired no complaints in relation to police action at Wednesday’s protest.”


On Thursday, at a demonstration against police techniques, which had been organised before Wednesday’s incident, about 200 demonstrators marched from the pupil union to Senate Home.


When demonstrators arrived, there have been skirmishes with police, who have been previously within the premises. Several much more police vans arrived and more than the subsequent two hrs there have been a series of clashes among small groups of protesters and police in the surrounding streets. College students again claimed the police had been hefty-handed.


Chessum mentioned he believed the “unprecedented response” by the authorities was component of an try to cease the student protest motion gaining momentum.


“They know from 2010 [when there have been large-scale pupil protests in London and close to the country] that this kind of heavy-handed policing puts individuals off, and I think this is what they are making an attempt to do this time.”



Police accused of using excessive force at student protests

18 Kasım 2013 Pazartesi

Academics back students in protests against economics teaching

Unemployed Men During the Great Depression

Unemployed men in the 1930s. ‘Students can complete an economics degree with no learning about the Excellent Depression.’ Photograph: Mark Benedict Barry/Corbis




A prominent group of academic economists have backed student protests towards neo-classical economics educating, increasing the pressure on top universities to reform programs that critics argue are dominated by totally free industry theories that disregard the effect of fiscal crises.


The academics from some of the UK’s most prestigious institutions, such as Cambridge and Leeds universities, mentioned college students were becoming short-changed by their programs, and they accused greater education funding bodies of being a barrier to reforms.


In a startling attack on the agencies that give educating and analysis grants, they said an “intellectual monoculture” is reinforced by a system of state funding based mostly on journal rankings “that are heavily biased in favour of orthodoxy and against intellectual diversity”.


The academics stated in a letter to the Guardian that a “dogmatic intellectual commitment” to teaching theories primarily based on rational buyers and workers with unlimited desires “contrasts sharply with the openness of educating in other social sciences, which routinely present competing paradigms”.


They stated: “College students can now complete a degree in economics without having getting been exposed to the theories of Keynes, Marx or Minsky, and with out getting discovered about the Excellent Depression.”


The attack follows protests at Manchester University. Students there, who formed the Publish Crash Economics Society, explained their programs did little to explain why economists failed to warn about the fiscal crisis and had too hefty a concentrate on instruction students for City jobs.


Earlier this month an worldwide group of economists, backed by the New York-primarily based Institute for New Financial Contemplating, pledged to overhaul the economics curriculum and supply universities an alternative course.


At a conference hosted by the Treasury at its London offices, they pledged to have a first-year program ready to teach for the 2014-15 academic yr that will contain economic history and a broader range of competing theories.


The debate more than the potential of economics teaching follows many years of debate about the part of academics, particularly in the US, in offering the intellectual underpinning for the borrowing and trading binge ahead of the 2008 crash.


Amounts of personal borrowing reached record amounts in many countries and trades in exotic derivatives, usually funded with debt instruments, soared to a level in which number of bank executives understood their publicity in the event of a credit crunch.


Several economists, which includes the 2013 Nobel prize winner Robert Shiller, have argued that mainstream economics wrongly teaches theories based on maintaining openly aggressive markets and that effectively-informed customers and sellers remove the threat of asset charges growing past a sustainable degree for a prolonged period.


The academics, led by Professor Engelbert Stockhammer of Kingston University, mentioned: “We comprehend students’ aggravation with the way that economics is taught in most institutions in the United kingdom.


“There exists a vibrant neighborhood of pluralist economists in the United kingdom and elsewhere, but these academics have been marginalised inside the profession. The shortcomings in the way economics is taught are directly relevant to an intellectual monoculture, which is reinforced by a method of public university funding (the Study Excellence Framework and previously the Study Evaluation Exercise) based mostly on journal rankings that are heavily biased in favour of orthodoxy and towards intellectual diversity,” they explained.




Academics back students in protests against economics teaching