The London Challenge is a lesson in how to turn around poor pupils" lives | Tristram Hunt

London students examine their GCSE results. Photograph: Lewis Whyld/PA

A decade in the past, dad and mom have been fleeing inner London to keep away from sending their kids to regional colleges. Nowadays, a bad pupil is more very likely to carry out better in the capital than anywhere else in the country. Considerably of this is down to the London Challenge policy of college collaboration which, in the mid-noughties, turned close to life chances – and now wants a nationwide rollout.

For if last week’s schooling debate was about the Pisa benefits, this week, it is the flip of the annual Ofsted report, published on Wednesday. Exactly where the worldwide information pointed to stagnation in schools specifications, even though some of our rivals shot past us, Ofsted’s chief inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw, looks probably to praise the continued improvement in England’s schools.

This obvious contradiction can be put down to disturbing regional disparities. In brief, lessons from the success of London Challenge are not being realized, and poor pupils (recognized this weekend as “white operating-class boys”) in coastal towns, 2nd-tier cities, and middle England counties are bearing the price. The Pisa report was clear on this: “As in numerous other nations, socioeconomically disadvantaged students in the Uk are significantly less probably to succeed at college than their much more advantaged peers. Even so, some countries are a lot more profitable than the United kingdom in lowering the influence of socioeconomic status on student performance.”

The data is unforgiving. Of the one.2 million younger folks on cost-free school meals final year who sat GCSEs, virtually two-thirds (64%) failed to obtain the expected level of attainment – 5 A*-C grades, like maths and English – at age sixteen. There is a 23 percentage stage gap (36%-59%) between the average attainment of youngsters on free college meals and the rest. This is a effective block to social mobility as effectively as a drag on broader academic attainment. A policy of educational equity is important if we are to attain the growing specifications that Germany and Poland have managed.

However across England this kind of equity is a long way off. In affluent counties, exactly where there is a thin spread of pupils on cost-free college meals, it is disadvantaged younger men and women who endure most. According to the government’s social mobility and kid poverty commission, “the worst region for attainment by the poorest pupils is south-east England, and the worst schools for them are in regions this kind of as West Berkshire and Herefordshire, and towns this kind of as Peterborough and Swindon”. Certainly, in West Berkshire and Herefordshire, only about a fifth of pupils on totally free college meals reach the expected degree of GCSE attainment.

In the previous, the schooling secretary, Michael Gove, has really rightly pulled up Labour-run city councils for failing to deliver on school improvement. He should now do the exact same for the Tory counties presiding above a policy of educational apathy that hits the poorest hardest.

We want to feel about how to apply London Challenge lessons to counties this kind of as Lincolnshire or cities this kind of as Wolverhampton. At its core was a commitment to breaking the hyperlink amongst deprivation and attainment. That meant zero tolerance of lower expectations, wise use of information to track pupil progress, and the strategic use of sponsored academies.

But in contrast to the government’s aggressive, totally free-market method to schooling, the Challenge was also built all around a technique of collaboration. It raised the common of teaching in the classroom by peer-to-peer assessment headteachers helped one another flip great colleges into exceptional and it provided a “pupil pledge”, providing youthful Londoners with accessibility to sport, the arts and university daily life. Right now, children on totally free school meals in London do 50% much better at GCSEs than their peers elsewhere.

The Challenge also essential political help, but after the 2010 election that was withdrawn. Rather than expanding the initiative, the coalition abandoned this strategy. The government clings to the dogma that an ever more competitive marketplace between isolated schools will supply rising specifications, at the very same time as all the global evidence – from Sweden to America – disputes this.

Our training program needs intervention to encourage the ideal teachers into the poorest executing schools track pupil progress effectively and generate networks of schools that collaborate to increase benefits. It is a historic reversal, but this week Wilshaw seems set to tell us the counties of England need to ape the councils of London – and understand that raising standards among the poorest pupils delivers improved attainment for all.

The London Challenge is a lesson in how to turn around poor pupils" lives | Tristram Hunt