Police face problems in recruiting informants in political groups | Guardian Undercover Blog

Tilly Gifford, with activists Juliana Napier and Dan Glass, with some of the recording equipment they used. Photograph: Murdo Macleod

There appears to be an endlessly wealthy list of names for informers. Rat, squealer, snitch, tout and snout are some that come very easily to thoughts.

There have been as several as 200 names dating back to the seventeeth century, in accordance to this account. Many are clearly derogatory, others colourful.

The origins of the names are frequently obscure. There are for instance two feasible explanations for a grass. Perhaps it came from the song, Whispering Grass, or potentially from the rhyming slang of grasshopper, meaning shopper or even copper.

What ever phrase is used, the practice of offering within details about colleagues, comrades, friends and even lovers to the authorities has been around for a really prolonged time.

Last week, a little sunlight was let into the hidden planet of informants in political campaigns. The Guardian uncovered how police had attempted to recruit a younger activist to grass on the political activities of college students and protesters in Cambridge. It was an offer he refused.

There had been some who pointed out that the recruitment of informers is not new (see for instance in the comments part of the story about the Cambridgeshire police and elsewhere).

There is minor doubt about that. It is a traditional approach that has been routinely exploited by the British police for decades. Considering that its inception in the 1880s, Specific Branch officers have relied on informers inside political groups to slip them info.

More not too long ago, campaigners from the 1960s and 1970s onwards have frequently told tales of how they have been approached by police to inform on their friends and fellow protesters. (If police have asked you to become an informant, I would be interested to hear from you).

A number of of these approaches have been publicised in the media from time to time. But the contemporary era has brought an crucial alter.

Campaigners now have the engineering to flip the tables on the police and surreptitiously record the meetings at which the police officers are making an attempt to recruit them.

An early illustration of this came 4 many years in the past when Tilly Gifford, an activist in the environmental Plane Stupid campaign, exposed an attempt by Scottish police to recruit her. You can read how she did it right here, right here and right here, and listen to the tapes of the recruitment pitch right here.

Obviously taping these varieties of approaches have a bigger influence in the media as the public can hear for themselves that it has happened, and they do not have to rely on the word of the activists.

Concealed recording products pose a dilemma for the police as the activists have a strong weapon to expose, and potentially, curb the recruitment of informers from inside their midst.

For the police, approaching any activist to grow to be an informant is a gamble, as a specific percentage are always going to say no and speak to their close friends about it.

It is also an occupational hazard, as other activists could go a stage additional and secrete a recording device in their outfits, and then pass the benefits on to the media.

This was what occurred in last week’s story about the Cambridge students and protesters – you can hear the clips right here, here, right here, right here and right here.

It appears that when police are striving to recruit an activist, they probe the would-be informants to see if they are sporting recording devices.

Remarkably in this tape recorded by Gifford in 2009, a police officer actually asks her if she is recording the exchanges with him, but still carries on trying to persuade her to turn out to be an informant.

Police face problems in recruiting informants in political groups | Guardian Undercover Blog